- students often produce more language than in face-to-face settings
- students tend to use more complex language when chatting, including more accurate usage of past-tense morphological markers
- there is greater equity in participation among students in a classroom
- students exhibit improved attitudes towards foreign language learning as a result of chatting (p. 36)
While I was reading these advantages, I realized that these are the issues are those typically associated with learner motivation and engagement levels in a reading and writing class. As reading and writing instructors, we want to present our students with opportunities where they can actively engage with the reading texts and writing tasks. We want students to become critical thinkers that can effectively and accurately convey ideas and discover their voice. Online environments create a platform where this discovery process can be facilitated and monitored. One of the major challenges for a reading and writing instructor is to increase learner's motivation levels (well, this is especially true in an ESL setting). If presenting reading and writing tasks in these environments allow for increased motivation and engagement levels, then as educators, can we really afford not to be integrating these into our lessons?
Another CMC environment that I think has plenty of potential for all grade levels is Voicethread. Although Voicethread is not free, for K-12 educators (for a single educator), subscription is $10 a month or $60 a year. If you visit the website and see all that this CMC environment has to offer, I believe that you would agree that $60 could be paid with a smile. Not only can students comment on presentations, documents through posting written comments, but they can also leave voice or video comments too.
I hope that you all are having a good week.Reference
Payne, J.S. & Ross, B.M. (2005). Synchronous CMC, working memory, and L2 oral proficiency development. Language Learning & Technology, 9(3), 35-54.
I think the reason for the advantage of "there is greater equity in participation among students in a classroom" is that when students are communicated online for a class, they feel like the more they write, the more points that will get them. In a real class setting, how many words they say doesn't usually matter for class participation points; instead, the teacher can observe each student face-to-face and be able to tell if they are participated in discussions. Does that make sense?
ReplyDeleteVoicethread is another awesome source! I've used it a couple of times in my undergrad classes and it was definitely something I could see myself using in my own classroom. It gives a little personality to the writing.
Great findings from this study and really makes you discount that "old" adage that computers will isolate individuals. I actually shared the reference with Denise (Reading Revolution) because it really does speak to the research she is doing.
ReplyDeleteVoicethread is a great Web 2.0 resource. I wish they wouldn't charge! Could you add the link to Voicethread on our Wiki site? I don't think it is there.